Saturday, November 29, 2025
HomeTechAndroid Emulator on M1/M2 Macs: ARM Virtualization Performance Benchmarks

Android Emulator on M1/M2 Macs: ARM Virtualization Performance Benchmarks

The Android Emulator for Mac has experienced a significant change with the introduction of Apple’s M1 and M2 processors. Originally intended for Intel specifications, Android emulators struggled to adapt as Apple migrated to its custom-designed silicon, the M1 and M2 chips. 

However, with increased developer demand and the potential for native support of ARM virtualization, Android Emulator on M1/M2 Mac devices can now ensure better performance, better energy consumption, and even better responsiveness. This path forward is an important step in mobile application development environments, especially for developers relying on Android automation.

Understanding ARM virtualization

Android emulators can now run natively on Apple’s M1 and M2 CPUs with ARM virtualization, with no need for Rosetta 2 or other x86 translation layers. ARM virtualization uses a cloud system to create lightweight virtual machines with hardware acceleration that utilize the ARM instruction set instead of traditional x86 virtualization.

Consequently, even Android emulators that support running on Mac have a better chance of being much more fluid and loading more nimbly. Native ARM Android Virtual Devices (AVDs) provide developers with a viable method to test ARM-native apps developed for Android by eliminating the compatibility issues that commonly affect Apple Silicon. With this modification, emulator performance and resource efficiency on macOS systems undergo a significant transformation, making the Android Emulator on Mac an even stronger tool for Android automation testing.

Evolution of Android Emulators on M1/M2 Macs

The switch from Intel’s x86 to Apple’s ARM-based architecture created compatibility issues at the start of the development of Android emulators for M1 and M2 Macs. At first, Android emulators used Rosetta 2 to translate x86 code, which led to limited support and poor performance. As Apple Silicon adoption grew, Google introduced native ARM Android Virtual Devices (AVDs), which used the cloud foundation for hardware acceleration.

Updates to Android Studio over time introduced native support for M1/M2 chips, which improved emulator stability, responsiveness, and boot times altogether. Nowadays, M1/M2 Macs provide a stable and high-performance environment for Android development to the extent that they equal and often exceed the performance and speed advantages compared to conventional Intel-based configurations, primarily because of advances to both the Android Emulator on Mac and Android Studio, which also streamline Android automation workflows.

Benchmarking methodology for ARM virtualization

Evaluating the efficiency of Android emulators operating on Apple’s M1 and M2 Macs through ARM virtualization requires a consistent and structured benchmarking method. The outlined approach guarantees precise, replicable outcomes that represent practical application and reliability for Android automation pipelines.

  • Indigenous vs translated AVD performance: Benchmarks compare ARM-native AVDs in Android to x86 AVDs running in Rosetta 2 and highlight the advantages of native performance on Apple Silicon. 
  • Cold boot and warm boot times: Measuring how long it takes for the emulator to perform a cold boot (start from the off state) and warm boot (load a saved state) can help the user measure responsiveness and performance efficiency.
  • App installation and startup speed: The testing involved installing large APKs and measuring the time to launch the app, to show the file I/O and runtime responsiveness of the emulator.
  • Interfacing display and frame rate (FPS): GPU-intensive animations and scrolling evaluations measure frame consistency and UI responsiveness, crucial for developing games and graphics-rich applications.
  • Construct and launch duration from Android Studio: The duration from code compilation to emulator deployment is monitored, emphasizing integration efficiency with the native ARM support of Android Studio.
  • Utilization of CPU and GPU resources: Through Activity Monitor and system-level tools, CPU and GPU usage are measured during idle, interaction, and stress conditions to assess performance efficiency.
  • Memory usage and allocation consistency: RAM consumption is tracked during the various lifecycle phases of the emulator to detect leaks, spikes, or bottlenecks that may impact the testing of large applications.
  • Thermal throttling and energy efficiency: Extended testing measures whether the device heats up under emulator load and if performance is limited on M1 compared to M2 chips.
  • ADB responsiveness and debugging delay: The duration required for ADB commands to be visible in the emulator is evaluated to guarantee a smooth debugging process for developers.
  • Battery drains on MacBooks while emulating: On MacBook models, battery usage rates are monitored to assess power efficiency during extended development periods.

Android Emulators’ performance on M1/M2 Macs

M1 and M2 Macs are showcasing improved performance of the Android emulators with the emergence of native ARM virtualization. By not relying on x86 emulation via Rosetta 2, the current Android emulators are now able to run ARM-based Android Virtual Devices (AVDs) natively on Apple Silicon. The improvements include faster boot time, smoother UI rendering, and better resource usage.

M1 Macs provide great performance for many development needs, while M2S are generally a substantial improvement in multicore performance, GPU performance, and thermal efficiency, which results in faster app builds and better emulator stability under load. Benchmark assessments indicate decreased latency during app deployment, increased frame rates for UI animations, and stable ADB responsiveness.

The M2 Pro and M2 Max versions particularly shine when it comes to operating several emulators at the same time without any performance drop. In general, the experience of using the Android emulator on M1/M2 Macs is now on par with or superior to that on high-end Intel systems, establishing Apple Silicon as a strong option for Android developers.

Challenges faced while evaluating ARM virtualization performance benchmarks

Evaluating the performance of the Android Emulator on M1 and M2 Macs presents various technical and practical difficulties. These challenges can affect precision, uniformity, and even the capacity to execute specific tests because of the changing landscape of Apple Silicon support and emulator tools.

  • Restricted assistance for previous emulator versions: Numerous legacy x86-based system images do not work with Apple Silicon, complicating the process of benchmarking different Android versions or comparing them to historical performance metrics.
  • Absence of cohesive tools for macOS ARM: Performance profiling tools such as Systrace, Perfetto, or Android Studio Profiler frequently show inconsistent behavior or are missing complete features on M1/M2 Macs.
  • Thermal limitations in fanless M1 devices: Devices such as the M1 MacBook Air might encounter throttling during prolonged use, leading to skewed benchmark results over long durations when compared to M1 Pro/Max models.
  • Challenges in accurately assessing GPU utilization: Apple’s monitoring tools offer restricted insights into GPU usage, making it challenging to identify rendering bottlenecks in GPU-heavy tests.
  • Regular updates for Android Studio and the emulator: Ongoing updates to Android Studio and the emulator may cause performance variations, complicating long-term assessments unless the tool versions are kept constant.
  • AVD performance fragmentation according to Android version: Emulator performance can differ significantly across Android versions, even on identical hardware, because of varying optimizations in system images.
  • Variations in memory management among AVDs: Some AVD setups show inconsistent RAM usage on M1/M2, making it difficult to benchmark memory usage under various testing scenarios.
  • Limitations of battery and power metrics: On macOS, obtaining real-time, precise battery usage or power efficiency data during emulator operation is more constrained compared to tools available on Linux or Windows.
  • Some third-party tools do not support ARM: The lack of native ARM builds in popular benchmarking and debugging tools used in Android testing necessitates workarounds that lower benchmark reliability.

Best Practices to overcome challenges with ARM virtualization

Addressing the difficulties of benchmarking Android emulators on M1 and M2 Macs necessitates a blend of technical modifications, regulated testing environments, and tool enhancements. These optimal strategies aid in guaranteeing precise, uniform, and significant outcomes in ARM virtualization assessment.

Monitor and record thermal incidents utilizing PowerMetrics: To address thermal monitoring issues when evaluating Android emulators on M1 and M2 Macs, it’s beneficial to incorporate a cloud-based platform such as LambdaTest into the testing approach.

LambdaTest is an AI-native testing platform that allows you to perform manual and automated tests at scale across 3000+ browsers and OS combinations. 

Additionally, LambdaTest offers Mac users the fascinating function of Android emulators, allowing testers to test and simulate Android native and web apps on their Macs, which is highly valuable for scaling Android automation across environments.

By transferring demanding tasks to the cloud, developers can reduce heat accumulation and the risks of throttling linked to extended emulator usage on fanless devices such as the M1 MacBook Air. 

Additionally, as cross-platform development expands, LambdaTest facilitates not only Android but also an Android Emulator for iPhone testing via browser-based simulation, simplifying the comparison of ARM virtualization across various devices. This cloud-focused method improves benchmarking precision, removes local hardware restrictions, and facilitates thermal-safe, large-scale testing processes.

  • Utilize only native ARM AVDs for performance testing: Steer clear of x86 system images on Rosetta to remove translation inconsistencies and guarantee you’re assessing true ARM performance.
  • Pin emulator and Android Studio version: Lock the versions of Android Studio and the emulator to prevent performance variations resulting from regular updates during the benchmarking phase.
  • Uniform AVD configurations: Always use uniform AVD configurations: RAM, resolution, and API level to avoid environmental differences when testing.
  • Testing on devices that have active cooling (e.g., M1 Pro/M2 Pro): Use Mac models with fans to mitigate thermal throttling when testing for long periods or under load (e.g., GPU-heavy benchmarking).
  • Use activity monitor and instruments as a way to monitor usage of other resources: Use integrated macOS tools like Activity Monitor and Instruments to provide trustworthy data on CPU, GPU, and memory usage.
  • Define separate test suites for each Android version: Organize the benchmarks based on Android OS levels so that the performance impact of changing system images across Android versions is understood.
  • Consistently utilize cold boot mode for startup tests: Always start the emulator from a completely powered-off condition (cold boot) when assessing startup performance for consistent results.
  • Record system status and background processes: Shut down unneeded applications and background processes, and record system status to ensure testing consistency.
  • Utilize terminal-based ADB scripts for accurate timings: Utilize ADB scripts through Terminal to automate tasks, reducing manual delays and achieving millisecond-level timing precision.

Also Read : The Importance of Landchecker Property Reports Online in Due Diligence

Conclusion

In conclusion, the performance, efficiency, and reliability of Android emulators have improved significantly, with the transition to ARM virtualization on M1 and M2 Macs. Native support for ARM-based Android Virtual Devices means that Rosetta 2 is no longer needed and benefits developers in terms of resource utilization, boot time, and smoother user interfaces.

The enhanced architecture of M2 Macs considerably improves emulator speed and stability, particularly when heavy workloads are involved. Even if problems like restricted support for third-party ARM tools and thermal limitations still exist, they are lessened by best practices and cloud platforms like LambdaTest. All things considered, the M1 and M2 Macs have completely changed the Android development process by providing a strong and effective environment for testing contemporary mobile apps using native ARM virtualization.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments